ID Number: 1241 From: "asitwilbe" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: Lisa Marie/ now vs then
Date: Tuesday, February 17 2004 - 20:33:10
--- In email@example.com, "bigsal47" <precisiontunecs@a...>
> I would have to agree with you on that one no question. Lisa is
> better looking now (if thats possible). I think her face is about
> the same, in fact I can't even see any signs of aging. I think the
> only thing that I can see is that her breasts are fuller and a
> little larger now. Also in some of her recent pictures her abdomen
> is a lot more defined, even though her waist has gone up to 23 from
> 21 in her Playmate data sheet. Other than her pubic hair style
> going from more hair to less and back a few times. She has pretty
> much kept her body and face perfect.
HAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHHHAHAA, wow, i was just reading these postings
while.....err.....playing guitar.......sounds like wall street talk
(circa.1709)....i didn't know i had grown so detached from the "ins"
and "outs" of pubic hair growth...
aside from that, [i'll be a commentator as well] i'm sure that the
difference in both quality and presentation comes from a 'personal
touch' on the set of whatever, wherever etc. with a little dose of
the cameraman's eye..(lens)...better locations, less
confinement/commitment to typical 'spread' shots, presumably endless
choices to be made, and the peak <?> physical fitness of a ballet
artist???? who the hell could argue with
that!!!.....who <i/>WANTS<i> to argue with that?
I would "totally" agree....the photos just keep getting
better....must be the food....¿
arg...forgot my URL language...^^italics up there^^
Contact me with any problems, suggest a correction, or a change. Please include the 'ID number'/search terms/what is wrong/any other information that you can think of and I will try to correct it.
Click Here to contact the webmaster