ID Number: 1570 From: "Raymond" <raymond756@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: breasts
Date: Sunday, March 26 2006 - 04:20:51
Maybe to make it look more realistic?
--- In lisamarie@yahoogroups.com, dwight1379 <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Ray.
> Yes quiet agree that pics can be tuched up ie 19-16. But if Lisa was
> paying to have scars removed. don't you think she would have the
> viens removed and her nips cleaned up as well?
> Regards.
>
> Dwight
>
> --- In lisamarie@yahoogroups.com, "Raymond" <raymond756@> wrote:
> >
> > Don't know if she got implants or not, but to me a picture would not
> > prove anything. The pics could have been retouched to hide any
> scars.
> >
> > Here are some examples of photo retouching
> >
> > http://homepage.mac.com/gapodaca/digital/digital.html
> >
> > http://homepage.mac.com/gapodaca/digital/bikini/index.html
> >
> > http://homepage.mac.com/gapodaca/digital/blonde/index.html
> >
> > My Sig
> > http://www.danasoft.com/sig/45042.jpg
> >
> >
> > --- In lisamarie@yahoogroups.com, emanon_43 <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dwight, I'm in agreement with you about Lisa's not having breast
> > > enhancement. However, I don't know if you are aware of the new
> > > methods of implanting but you will see no scars under or around
> the
> > > breast. They now go through the navel, use a little tool that
> pushes
> > > the implant up to the breast and then fill it to the desired
> size.
> > > No runs, no hits, no errors - clean and simple.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In lisamarie@yahoogroups.com, dwight1379 <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In lisamarie@yahoogroups.com, "bigsal47"
> > > <precisiontunecs@a...>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't think Lisa has had any surgical work to her breasts.
> If
> > > > you
> > > > > look at her newest pics her breasts are definetly larger, but
> > > her
> > > > body
> > > > > is not as super thin as it was when she first opened her site
> in
> > > > 2000.
> > > > > There are two sets, one called "Fence" and another one
> > > > > called "Turquoise Beads" where Lisa is really ripped and
> lean,
> > > you
> > > > can
> > > > > actually see each muscle in her stomach, and her breasts are
> not
> > > as
> > > > > large. The newer sets Lisa's tummy is still flat and firm,
> but
> > > not
> > > > as
> > > > > cut up as in those other sets. Also her hips are a little
> more
> > > > curvy
> > > > > and her legs a bit more muscular. So I think it is a natural
> > > > growth
> > > > > to her chest not implants.
> > > > >
> > > > Hi folks I think the latest set answers this question Image
> 7519,
> > > > Lisa
> > > > is flat on her back With her breast showing the under bust
> area.
> > > No
> > > > marks and it is a close shot as well.
> > > > Regards
> > > > Dwight
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Contact me with any problems, suggest a correction, or a change. Please include the 'ID number'/search terms/what is wrong/any other information that you can think of and I will try to correct it.
Click Here to contact the webmaster