ID Number: 1604 From: emanon_43 <no_reply@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: Shower!
Date: Saturday, June 03 2006 - 05:46:07
I think set #308-15 would be absolutely amazing without the
shadowing obviously done. I think Lisa knows exactly what she's
doing, if she reveals "all" to soon, would a lot of her fans lose
interest? - the mystery is part of the game, and a fun game it is!
--- In lisamarie@yahoogroups.com, "the_insider28"
<the_insider28@...> wrote:
>
> I think AYHJA has a solid point: there's nothing wrong with
pictures
> of feminine beauty in its complete form. There's nothing
tasteless
> or low-class about it.
>
> And for the record, Lisa DOES takes explicit nudes… she just
doesn't
> share them. Consider the following examples…
>
> Set 66_18 should have been the second hottest shot of Lisa ever.
>
> Set 165_14 just poor camera work? No way.
>
> Set 214 has several explicit shots that were cropped, as does set
> 216.
>
> Set 226_045 is another example.
>
> Set 231, shots 13 and 14… and especially 21.
>
> Set 232_11.
>
> Set 240_45 and 48.
>
> Set 261_16 and 19.
>
> Set 288_009 should have been THE hottest shot of Lisa, all time.
>
> She posed for these. She continues to. Unedited, some of these
> images are just as explicit as anything you would see in Penthouse
> or High Society.
>
> I respect everyone's opinion, but the idea that there are "no
> pretenses" in Lisa's photos, or that "explicit isn't in her
nature"
> is something I just don't agree with.
>
> No question that Lisa has set a boundary in what she is willing to
> reveal on her website… while still allowing the occasional peek…
but
> the idea that Lisa is somehow "too pure" to pose a certain way is
> incorrect. Look at Lisa's face in those pictures: she's having a
> great time!
>
>
> --- In lisamarie@yahoogroups.com, "AYHJA, Inc." <AYHJA@> wrote:
> >
> > Well...I'm happy with Lisa's current degree of sexuality...But I
> can't
> > lie, my feelings wouldn't but hurt at all if she turned up the
> heat
> > juuuuuusta bit...She may be sweet, nice, an artist and all that,
> but
> > she's certainly doesn't look like the most frigid woman that
I've
> ever
> > seen...I would not be disappointed in the slightest if she
showed
> sides
> > of her that are complete visual expressions of powerful
feelings...
> >
> > We can make it seem pretty all we want, but when I see a
beautiful
> woman
> > like LMS nude and in a shower, I'm not thinking about sniffing
> lilacs in
> > the middle of a pasture with a meadow flowing quietly in the
> > background...Lisa's business is to be sex...y...And she does her
> job in
> > a very tasteful fashion...Adn there's nothing wrong with
> that...And
> > there is nothing wrong with simulated, more sensual expression
> either...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Philip wrote:
> > > I totally agree with you, strait_flush5.
> > >
> > > I've had the opportunity to meet Lisa and visit with her on a
> few
> > > occasions and have perceived her to be one of the sweetest,
most
> fun
> > > loving and down-to-earth people I have ever met. I don't
believe
> > > explicit is in her nature. I, for one, would be disappointed
if
> it
> > > were. We all know how beautiful she is on the outside, but as
> you
> > > mentioned, I, too, believe her personality shines through in
her
> > > photos. She has the heart of an artist which at one time she
> > > expressed through dance. Now she expresses it through
> modeling. I
> > > hope the content of her future photo shoots remains status
> quo.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In lisamarie@yahoogroups.com, strait_flush5 <no_reply@>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> WHY?
> > >>
> > >> Why does Lisa need to turn more explicit? There are plenty
of
> > >> options out there if you prefer to see more, but there aren't
> that
> > >> many drop-dead gorgeous models that remain who still retain
the
> > >> standards they set for themselves when they started.
> > >>
> > >> Part of Lisa's allure is that she stays within her limits.
> > >> Basically, this is one more proof that she is genuine - there
> are
> > >>
> > > no
> > >
> > >> pretenses in her photos or videos. I expect that this is
> actually
> > >> how she might be in person - her true personality comes
through.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --- In lisamarie@yahoogroups.com, Ashok Parikh
<firstfoamtex@>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Indeed.
> > >>>
> > >>> Lisa needs to turn more explicit, her preety sensuality is
> > >>>
> > >> turning more radiant as her personality is maturing.
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> Keep up shower photo explicitness in other concepts.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Frank <precisiontunecs@> wrote:
> > >>> Lisa's newest video entitled Shower features probably one
of
> > >>>
> > > her
> > >
> > >> most
> > >>
> > >>> explicit shots ever. It is her leaning over and the camera
> > >>>
> > >> captures
> > >>
> > >>> all of her buttocks but also her bare vagina betweeen her
> legs.
> > >>>
> > >> Quite
> > >>
> > >>> an interesting shot, one we haven't seen from Lisa before.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ---------------------------------
> > >>> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Visit your group "lisamarie" on the web.
> > >>>
> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > >>> lisamarie-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >>>
> > >>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
> of
> > >>>
> > >> Service.
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> ---------------------------------
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ---------------------------------
> > >>> New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from
your
> PC
> > >>>
> > >> and save big.
> > >>
> > >>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > .
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Contact me with any problems, suggest a correction, or a change. Please include the 'ID number'/search terms/what is wrong/any other information that you can think of and I will try to correct it.
Click Here to contact the webmaster