ID Number: 1624 From: delbert_delbert_delbert <no_reply@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: frustrated/pedestal... (Boycott!!!)
Date: Tuesday, July 25 2006 - 05:26:50
I started this thread months ago and I'm ashamed I did. I've tried
to urge Lisa Marie to pose in certain ways and expose herself in more
shameful ways. How pathetic. None of us should be demeaning any
woman in this way. You can spill the crap that this is what she does
for a living, but that still doesn't make it right for her, for you,
or for me. I'm posting this and leaving the group. I do not plan to
be back. This may fall on deaf ears, but I had to say it.
--- In lisamarie@yahoogroups.com, Ashok Parikh <firstfoamtex@...>
wrote:
>
> Dear Lisa:
>
> Whether you read this mail, bother or not; I believed since you
first appeared in PB
> that you will amass a huge following of admirers and you did. It
is time that you and your sponsorers listen to your fans - take their
views sincerely and seriously.
>
> They devoted their loyalty for years, you can not and should not
let them down.
>
> Time is against all.
>
> Take care.
>
> Ashok
>
>
>
> strait_flush5 <no_reply@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> For being only a mild, past fan, you sure seem to pay a
lot of
> attention to this Yahoo group.
>
> If you don't think her recent stuff is very great, then stop
> obssessing over what she has done recently, and find another model.
>
> --- In lisamarie@yahoogroups.com, killgwbushnow <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > Anyone ever stop to think the reason the fans put her on a
pedestal
> > is because she DOESN'T show her "holy" beaver (or much of it).
> >
> > Personally I'm only a mild past fan of her early work -- her
recent
> > stuff is NOT so great! I won't be signing up again unless there
is
> a
> > major change in her website quality/quantity/nudity.
> >
> > Boycott LMScott! (Maybe then she'll get the idea!)
> >
> >
> > --- In lisamarie@yahoogroups.com, "Frank" <precisiontunecs@>
wrote:
> > >
> > > You make many vaid points. I think many Lisa Marie fans as a
> whole
> > > tend to put her on a pedestal more than any other nude model
> ever.
> > > I think Lisa is probably one of the only Playmates from the
> > > mid '90's to still regularly pose nude. No doubt she is a
classy
> > > woman, and probably one of the best Playmates ever in my mind
but
> I
> > > think we sometimes forget that Lisa is selling sex. It may
sound
> > > crude or whatever, but we pay our 19.99 a month to see Lisa
take
> > her
> > > clothes off, bottom line. I personally love her site, I love
all
> > > the photo sets, the videos, etc. It has also been mentioned
here
> > > numerous times about how Lisa does crop alot of her photos. I
> > > really didn't notice it until it was mentioned here and going
> back
> > > and looking at those photos I can't beleive I missed how much
> > > cropping is really done. There are some pics where Lisa's legs
> are
> > > wide open and her body is in a position where her entire vagina
> is
> > > pointing straight at the photographer. So basically the
> > > photographer and crew of her photo shoots get to see some
really
> > > explicit shots of Lisa, and if you go and look at the photos
and
> if
> > > they were not cropped they would be at mininmum Penthouse
style.
> > So
> > > it does seem that Lisa's vagina is only meant for a select few
to
> > > see and not for the fans she poses for, hopefully one day soon
> that
> > > will all change.
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> See the all-new, redesigned Yahoo.com. Check it out.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Contact me with any problems, suggest a correction, or a change. Please include the 'ID number'/search terms/what is wrong/any other information that you can think of and I will try to correct it.
Click Here to contact the webmaster