Message archive from Lisa Marie Scott's Official Yahoo Group at LisaMarie
Search    From    Subject    Date    Email

Home      Random

Previous      Next

ID Number: 1688
From: "Sal" <precisiontunecs@aol.com>
Subject: Re: i want more
Date: Thursday, January 04 2007 - 04:49:22

--- In lisamarie@yahoogroups.com, dorphman <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> I have a question. Does Lisa really believe we are turned on by a
> video showing her pussy in low res? Come on! This is 2007. The
> technology has been available for a long time now to show her vids
in
> hi res. I just joined the site and am very disappointed at the
> infrequency of video updates, but especially with the low res on
the
> vids. This is pathetic and not worth the money. Lisa is possibly
> the hottest model out there, but with the low quality she's
> producing, there are plenty of other models we can go to to get
our
> fix.
>
> While I'm at it, it's no secret that Lisa has had a boobjob. Not
> that I'm complaining. I think she looked beatiful natural, but
her
> big tits today look really nice. Now that she's gotten away from
> natural, why doesn't she do a few more things, like get her belly
> button pierced, or better yet, her pussy? Of course, if she did
> that, we'd need hi res to truly appreciate it.
>
> I love a girl with lots of jewelry. One of my favorite things
about
> Lisa is when she wears metal belts with nothing underneath.
That's
> hot. Like in the guitar video. Her best, by the way. It's not
> kitchen, although that's nice, too. With the amount of pussy she
> showed in country bar, especially with her legs spread, that vid
> would probably had been her best, if it was in hi res.
>
> Come on, Lisa. Give us hi res vids. Please. I'm writing this in
> case Lisa checks this site. I don't see any postings from her
> though. And spread your legs more. Your thick thighs are your
best
> feature as far as I can tell. But theyre most accentuated when
your
> legs are spread.
>
> Lisa may have a better feature than her thighs, but we'll never
know
> if we don't get hi res out of her. I'm thinking that maybe her
> cooter's nasty. I mean, she rarely shows it in pics, and it's
never
> hi res on vids. Pics can be airbrushed. Video can't be. That
may
> be why we never get hi res shots of her pussy on video. I'd love
to
> see and find out.
>
> I doubt we'll ever see Lisa really finger herself, like my other
> favorites. She'll probably never use a dildo, or do any real girl-
> girl stuff. So if we're missing out on all of these goodies, are
the
> other things too much to ask? A membership costs $240 over the
> course of a year.
>
You make some valid points. But I don't think we are going to see
Lisa insert a finger or dildo into her vagina on her website anytime
soon. Or do any girl/girl or boy/girl. I don't think that
interests her. I personally would like Lisa to get a little more
erotic in her photo sets and videos, like you said she does spread
her legs alot in her sets. And most of the pictures do show alot of
her exposed vagina, but they are cropped so we can see her sweet
spot. Lisa probably spreads her legs more than any Playboy style
model out there, it is one of her best traits as a nude model, I
just hope one day she will show us the perfection between those
perfect thighs.

Previous      Next

Home      Random



For the message list CLICK HERE

For missing messages CLICK HERE

Contact me with any problems, suggest a correction, or a change.
Please include the 'ID number'/search terms/what is wrong/any other information that you can think of and I will try to correct it.
Click Here to contact the webmaster